We believe that a true and comprehensive
understanding of Islam would not be possible without careful recognition of the
Prophetic Tradition and the Prophet's Household. And Allah is the Source of Strength.
Ayesha's Role in Islam
Mail
Box Letter Relevant to this
Topic
Letter
11:
Uselessness of Shia/Sunni Discussions & Article about
Ayesha
Read the following article in Urdu as well by
clicking Here >>
اُردو ترجمے کے لئے یہاں جائیں
As said in previous articles, the Shias have great respect and reverence for wives of Prophet Muhammad (SAW), the Ummul momineen, wives such as Hz Khadija and Hz Umme Salammah. Ayesha however has been a source of great dispute between the different Islamic Schools of thought.
Does this conflict in views regarding Ayesha and the hype due to the fact that she was Abu Bakr's daughter or it is due to the fact that she was one of the eleven wives of the Prophet? Ayesha no doubt was a wife of Prophet Muhammad (SAW) and thus she is the one of the Ummul momineen, or Mother of the believers. Where does the arguement lie?
Sunnis claim,
- Ayesha was the favorite wife of Prophet Muhammad (SAW)
- Ayesha was the best woman and the best wife of Prophet (SAW)
- Ayesha is the mother of all believers
- Ayesha and other wives of the Prophet (SAW) are a part of the Ahlulbayt
Thus love and respect for Ayesha is compulsory. The sunni brethren conclude that any insult or disrespect against Ayesha is a disrespect to the Prophet.
The Shias however say that;
- Ayesha was not the favorite wife of Prophet Muhammad (SAW)
- Ayesha was not even the best woman of her own time
- Ayesha is not a part of the blessed Ahlulbayt
- Ayesha was jealous of other wives of Prophet (SAW)
- Ayesha used to plot against the Prophet (SAW) himself
- Ayesha used to fight with other wives of Prophet (SAW)
- Ayesha used to argue with Prophet Muhammad (SAW) and her jealousy used to come in between her obedience to the Prophet
- Ayesha fought against Imam Ali, the Khalifa e Rashid and the Great Sahabi
- Ayeshas' coming out of her house during The battle of Camel (Jamal) was against the clear verdict of the Quran itself
- Ayesha is the mother of believers but her actions will declare if she was a good mother or the sort of a mother who needs to be dissociated from
- Previous wives of Prophets such as Nuh (AS) and Lut (AS) will be in hell due to the sin they committed thus being a wife of a Prophet is no merit
- Criticism against Ayesha for her transgression against Prophet Muhammad (SAW), his ahlulbayt and laws of Allah is not in anyway a disrespect to the Prophet (SAW), but is a sign of our love for Prophet (SAW), his ahlulbayt and the laws of Allah
I in no way want to disrespect anyone's feelings. But you must realize where should our loyalty lie. Being emotionally linked with a non-divine personality may result in transgression against those who are the blessed and the chosen people of Allah.
First thing first,
The Prophet is closer to the believers than themselves, and his
wives are their mothers. And blood relations among each other have closer
personal ties in the decree of Allah than the believers and the Muhajirin,
except that you do kindness to those brothers. This has been written in the Book
Quran [33:6]
On the basis of the special relationship mentioned above,
another characteristic of the Holy Prophet is that his wives are forbidden to
the Muslims just like their own real mothers although their adopted mothers are
in no sense their real mothers. This thing is peculiar only to the person of
the Holy Prophet and of no other man in the world. In this connection, one
should also know that the wives of the Holy Prophet are mothers of the believers
only in the sense that the Muslims are under obligation to have reverence and
respect for them, and no Muslim could marry them. As for other matters they are
not like the mothers. For example, apart from their real relatives, all other
Muslims were non-mahram for them from whom they had to observe Purdah; their
daughters were not like real sisters for the Muslims, so that no Muslim could
marry them; their brothers and sisters were not like the maternal uncles and
aunts for the Muslims; they could not be inherited by a Muslim, unless a close
relative, as a mother is inherited by her son. Another noteworthy point in this
connection is that according to the Qur'an, this status accrues to all the wives
of the Holy Prophet among whom Hadrat 'A'ishah is also included. But, when a
section (of the Muslims) made Hadrat `AIi and Fatimah (may Allah be pleased with
them) and their children the centre of their Faith and made the whole system of
religion revolve around them, and made Hadrat `A'ishah also, along with many
other Companions, the target of curse and abuse, this verse became a hindrance
for them, for according to it every person who claims to be a believer has to
acknowledge her as his mother.
Tafheem ul Quran by Abul ala Maududi, Tafseer of Surah 33
verse 6
As claimed by Maududi, this verse which declares Ayesha to be the mother of believers was only to prohibit all Muslims marrying her after the demise of Prophet Muhammad (SAW). She however was not the real mother thus the law of inheriting from your son (the whole Ummah in this case) would not be applicable to her. Similarly, she would have to observe proper Hijab infront of everyone else even though she was our mother where as a real mother is free from this obligation in front of her children.
Thus the title of "Mothers of believers" was only to stop muslims marrying the wives of Prophet (SAW) after his demise.
Maududi goes on to claim that this verse nullifies the Shia way of criticizing Ayesha for her evil. This will be discussed later on.
As far as being the mother of believers is concerned, the hardcore Ibne Kathir backs this claim,
(and his wives are their mothers.) means, they are unlawful for
marriage. In terms of honor, respect and veneration, it is not permissible for
them to be alone with them, and the prohibition of marriage to them does not
extend to their daughters and sisters, according to scholarly consensus.
Tafsir Ibne Kathir, Tafsir of Surah 33, verse 6
People who claim that criticism against Ayesha is wrong because she is the mother of believers, I do not see a link.
Is it wrong to criticize your mother's wrong actions? Is being our mother mean being infallible? Or does it give Ayesha the liberty to do anything, good or bad, yet entitled to the same respect you should show towards the infallibles?
I am a Muslim. If my mother starts to abuse Hz Ali, for example, shouldn't i try to rectify her actions or distant myself from her or make her stop her blasphemous act? If my mother is thief, shouldn't i try to help her follow the right path or if she continues her evil action, shouldn't i show my disgust at her evil? I am not relating such actions with Ayesha. The point is doing evil, transgressing against the Limits set by Allah and disobeying the Prophet. If my mother kills her friend intentionally, should i still see her as a sin-free woman? Should i still respect her and should i praise her for her actions wether they are unjust?
I fail to see where does the merit lie in being the mother of believers. Please show me from Quran, authentic Sunnah of Prophet (SAW), or your own logic, that;
- Mothers of believers are infallibles and cannot sin
- If they can sin, they will not be punished by Allah
- If they commit a transgression against Allah, his Prophet (SAW) or his Ahlulbayt, their actions should not be criticized because they are our mothers
- Criticizing the mother of a believer for her evil actions is a sin
If you cannot prove any of the above, then let us ask ourselves, which is a bigger merit, being a mother of the believers or being a wife of the Prophet.
Allah sets forth an example to those who
disbelieve the wife of Nuh and the wife of Lut: they were both under two of Our
righteous servants, but they acted treacherously towards them so they
availed them naught against Allah, and it was said: Enter both the fire with
those who enter.
Quran [66:10]
(The wife of Nuh and the wife of Lut. They were under two of
our righteous servants,) means, they were the wives of two of Allah's
Messengers and were their companions by day and night, eating with them and
sleeping with them, as much as any marriage contains of interaction between
spouses. However, (they both betrayed them.) meaning, in the faith, they did
not adhere to the faith sent through their husbands nor accepted their message.
Therefore, all the intimate knowledge of their husbands neither helped them nor
prevented punishment, hence Allah's statement, (So, they availed them not
against Allah) means, because their wives were disbelievers
Tafsir Ibne Kathir, Tafsir of Surah 66, verse 10
The answer, is none. Neither being a mother of the believers, nor being the wife of a Prophet is a merit, and true merit lies in actions. Any wife of Prophet Muhammad if sinned to transgressed against the limits set by Allah will be punished doubly by Allah for her actions and we are free to criticize them for their sin.
O wives of the prophet! whoever of you
commits an open indecency, the punishment shall be increased to her doubly;
and this IS easy to Allah. And whoever of you is obedient to Allah and His
Messenger and does good, We will give to her her reward doubly, and We have
prepared for her an honorable sustenance.
Quran [33:30-31]
Please read about Tabarra to know better what i mean by criticism, love and hate.
So now coming to the facts. What wrong did Ayesha do?
Narrated 'Aisha: I did not feel jealous
of any of the wives of the Prophet as much as I did of Khadija (although) she
died before he married me, for I often heard him mentioning her, and Allah
had told him to give her the good tidings that she would have a palace of Qasab
(i.e. pipes of precious stones and pearls in Paradise), and whenever he
slaughtered a sheep, he would send her women-friends a good share of it
Sahih Bukhari Volume 5, Book 58, Number 164
Narrated 'Aisha: I did not feel jealous
of any of the wives of the Prophet as much as I did of Khadija though I did not
see her, but the Prophet used to mention her very often, and when ever he
slaughtered a sheep, he would cut its parts and send them to the women friends
of Khadija. When I sometimes said to him, "(You treat Khadija in such a way)
as if there is no woman on earth except Khadija," he would say, "Khadija was
such-and-such, and from her I had children."
Sahih Bukhari Volume 5, Book 58, Number 166
This not only proves that Ayesha was jealous of Hz Khadija but also that Hz Khadija was the most favorite wife of Prophet Muhammad (SAW).
'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her)
reported: I felt jealous of the women who offered themselves to Allah's
Messenger (may peace be upon him) and said: Then when Allah, the Exalted and
Glorious, revealed this:" You may defer any one of them you wish, and take to
yourself any you wish; and if you desire any you have set aside (no sin is
chargeable to you)" (xxxiii. 51), I ('A'isha.) said: It seems to me that your
Lord hastens to satisfy your desire.
Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3453
Her jealousy was not only limited to Hz Khadija but also to women who proposed the Prophet (SAW) for marriage. Her dislike for such women can also be seen from the rhetorical comment she passes at the end of the narration.
Narrated 'Ubaid bin 'Umar: I heard 'Aisha
saying, "The Prophet used to stay for a long while with Zanab bint Jahsh and
drink honey at her house. So Hafsa and I decided that if the Prophet came to
anyone of us, she should say him, "I detect the smell of Maghafir (a nasty
smelling gum) in you. Have you eaten Maghafir?' " So the Prophet visited one
of them and she said to him similarly. The Prophet said, "Never mind, I have
taken some honey at the house of Zainab bint Jahsh, but I shall never drink of
it anymore." So there was revealed: 'O Prophet ! Why do you ban (for you) that
which Allah has made lawful for you . . . If you two (wives of Prophet) turn in
repentance to Allah,' (66.1-4) addressing Aisha and Hafsa. 'When the Prophet
disclosed a matter in confidence to some of his wives.' (66.3) namely his
saying: But I have taken some honey."
Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 63, Number 192
Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 63, Number 193
Sahih Muslim Book 009, Number 3496
Note that Ayesha disliked the Prophet's stay at the house of Zainab and thus she plotted a lie against the Prophet to force him not to stay/go there for long. I ask those who claim to love and revere Prophet Muhammad (SAW). Is this not disrespect to the Prophet himself?
“When the Prophet confided unto one of his
wives a matter, but when she divulged it (unto others) and God apprised him
therefore, he made known a part of it and avoided a part; so when he informed
her of it, said she: ‘Who informed thee of this?’ He said: ‘Informed, me, the
All-Knowing, the All-Aware’. If you both (women) repent to
Allah, (it is better for you), for your hearts have swerved from the right path and
if you supported each other against the Prophet, you
should know that Allah is his Protector, and after Him Gabriel and the righteous
believers and the angels are his companions and helpers.
Happily his Lord if he divorceth you, will give him in your place wives better
than you, submissive, faithful, obedient, repentant, prayerful, observers of
fast, widows and virgins.”
Quran [66:3-5]
All scholars agree that these verses were for Ayesha and Hafsa.
Narrated Ibn Abbas: I intended to ask 'Umar
so I said, "Who were those two ladies who tried to back each other against the
Prophet?" I hardly finished my speech when he said, They were 'Aisha and
Hafsa."
Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 436
Narrated 'Umar: The wives of the Prophet
out of their jealousy, backed each other against the Prophet, so I said to
them, "It may be, if he divorced you all, that Allah will give him, instead of
you wives better than you." So this Verse was revealed. (66.5)
Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 438
The word tazahur means to cooperate mutually in opposition to
another person, or to be united against another person. Shah Waliyullah has
translated this sentence, thus: "If you mutually join together to cause distress
to the Prophet. " Shah 'Abdul Qadir's translation is: "If you both overwhelm
him." Maulana Ashraf 'AII Thanwi's translation urns: "And if you both continued
to work thus against the Prophet. " And Maulana Shabbir Ahmad 'Uthmami has
explained it thus: ,"lf you two continued to work and behave thus (against the
Prophet)."
Tafheem ul Quran, by Abul ala Maududi, Tafseer of Surah
66, Verse 4
As per the Quranic verses stated above, we get to know that;
- Two wives of Prophet (SAW) backed each other against the Prophet himself and caused him (SAW) distress
- These were Ayesha bint Abu Bakr and Hafsa Bint Umer
- Ayesha was surprised at the Prophet's knowledge of Ghayb revealed to him by Allah through Jibrael (AS) as she asked the Prophet that who informed him of the transgression Ayesha has commited
- Ayesha's act was a disobedience to Prophet Muhammad (SAW)
- Ayesha and Hafsa are told to repent or face the consequences
- Allah says that if Ayesha and/or Hafsa are divorced by Prophet (SAW), he will be given wives better than the ones he already has. Thus it is proven that Ayesha was not even the best woman of her own time, save being the best/favorite wife of Prophet Muhammad (SAW)
And whoever disobeys Allah and His Messenger and goes beyond
His limits, He will cause him to enter fire to abide in it, and he shall have an
abasing chastisement.
Quran [4:14]
The disobedience to prophet (SAW) by anyone, be it you, me, his companions or his wives, without sincere repentance, the end result is the hell fire. Any sort of disobedience to Prophet (SAW) should be highly criticized for our love for Prophet (SAW) forces us to show disgust at people who troubled him.
Now coming to the issue of fitnah.
Ibn 'Umar reported that Allah's
Messenger (may peace be upon him) stood by the door (of the apartment of) gafsa
and, pointing towards the east, he said: The turmoil would appear from this
side, viz. where the horns of Satan would appear, and he uttered these words
twice or thrice and Ubaidullah b. Sa'ld in his narration said. The Messenger of
Allah (may peace be upon him) had been standing by the door of 'A'isha.
Sahih Muslim Book 041, Number 6939
Ibn Umar reported that Allah's Messenger
(may peace be upon him) came out from the house of 'A'isha and said: It would be
from this side that there would appear the height of unbelief, viz. where appear
the horns of Satan. i. e. cast.
Sahih Muslim Book 041, Number 6941
Remember The Surah where two wives of Prophet (SAW) are ordered to repent or face the consequences?
If you two turn in repentance to Allah, your hearts are indeed
so inclined; but if you help one another against him, then verily, Allah is
his Protector, and Jibril, and the righteous among the believers; and after that
the angels are his helpers
Quran [66:4]
Layth bin Abi Sulaym said from Mujahid: and the righteous among
the believers; includes `Ali bin Abi Talib also
Tafsir Ibne Kathir, Tafsir of Surah 66, Verse 4
Thus if the two specific wives of Prophet, namely Ayesha and Hafsa did not repent to Allah, and continued to back each other against the Prophet of Allah, then they will first have to face Allah, Jibrael (AS), angels and the righteous amongst the believers as these are the protectors of Prophet Muhammad (SAW). As inclusion of Mawla Ali in the group of believers is agreed by Shias and Sunnis alike, we can also say that if Ayesha and Hafsa continued their transgression, they will have to first face the protectors of Prophet Muhammad (SAW), which includes Ali ibn Abu Talib as well.
Ayesha's battle against Imam Ali in the battle of Jamal, irrespective of the circumstances which caused it, can be termed as the predefined show-down between the Protector of Prophet Muhammad (SAW) and the wife of Prophet (SAW) which did not repent. This how ever is theoretical. This is my belief, because i have pledged my allegiance to the son of Abu Talib.
But it doesn't change the fact. The fact that Ayesha did come out of her house, to wage war against Ameer ul Momineen, Imam ul Mutaqeen, Sahabi e Muhammad, Khalifa e Rashid, brother and cousin of Prophet Muhammad (SAW), Mawla Ali (AS).
If i curse or abuse a companion of the Prophet, let us say Umer for an example, my actions will enrage every muslim, Sunnis atleast. Similarly, if i abuse or Curse Mawla Ali (AS), it will again enrage every Muslim. This is because we love/revere or claim to love/revere such personalities. So if my verbal curse/abuse against such a personality can give birth to emotions of hatred against me, shouldn't actions of physical assault on such personalities give birth to the same emotions against people who intended to kill Imam Ali? Because fighting, physical attacks and intentions to kill is a greater disrespect than verbal criticism.
If i enter a battle field with horses, swords and an army, i am either stupid or i am hiding my true intentions if i claim that my purpose is not to kill/fight the opposition. The men who gathered in Basra, against Imam Ali (AS), were a part of rebellion against the very Mawla.
As this is the same Ali who is included in the Ahlulbayt, who is told to be loved and who is the Mawla of everyone who consider Prophet (SAW) as their Mawla, it is my love and respect, my loyalty and reverence for this man which forces me to dislike the people who fought him, including Ayesha.
Thus those who claim to love all the Sahaba of Prophet (SAW) and also all the wives of Prophet (SAW) are liars, because you cannot love two people who are intending to kill each other. If you love one, you must hate his enemies. Ayesha's rebellion against Imam Ali, irrespective of the circumstances, is highly criticizable and against the orders of Quran and Prophet (SAW). For Quran prohibits wives of Prophet (SAW) to not leave their houses after his (SAW) demise and the Prophet declares Haqq or Truth to turn wherever Ali turns.
According to the Hadith, Umm Salama is known to have said that Muhammad said:
Ali is with the Truth (haqq) and the Qur'an, and the Truth
and the Qur'an are also with Ali, and they will be inseparable until they come
upon me at Kawthar.
al-Bahrani's
Ghâyat al-marâm wa-hujjat al-hisâm,
page 539
The above reference recounts the hadith in fifteen versions from Sunni sources and eleven versions from Shi'a sources.
In some versions of the hadith of the pond of Khumm there is an extra sentence that is the Prophet had said;
Wa dara al-haqq ma'ahu haithu dar
"And the truth (the right path) turns with him (i.e. Ali) wherever way he
turns."
Tafsir al-Kabir, by Fakhr al-Din al-Razi, under the
commentary of "al-Bismilah"
Similarly in Sahih al-Tirmidhi, it is narrated that:
The Messenger of God said: "O God, have Thy Mercy on Ali. O
God, make the right and the truth with Ali in all situations."
Sahih al-Tirmidhi, Volume 5, page297
Thus the Haqq will always be with Ali, which makes his opponents Baatil, irrespective of who they are.
(O wives of Prophet) And stay
in your houses and do not display your finery like the displaying of the
ignorance of yore; and keep up prayer, and pay the poor-rate, and obey Allah
and His Messenger…………………
Quran [33:33]
(And stay in your houses,) means, stay in your houses and do
not come out except for a purpose. One of the purposes mentioned in Shari`ah
is prayer in the Masjid, so long as the conditions are fulfilled, as the
Messenger of Allah said: (Do not prevent the female servants of Allah from the
Masjids of Allah, but have them go out without wearing fragrance.) According to
another report: (even though their houses are better for them.) (and do not
Tabarruj yourselves like the Tabarruj of the times of ignorance,) Mujahid said:
"Women used to go out walking in front of men, and this was the Tabarruj of
Jahiliyyah.'' Qatadah said: (and do not Tabarruj yourselves like the Taburruj of
the times of ignorance,) "When they go out of their homes walking in a shameless
and flirtatious manner, and Allah, may He be exalted, forbade that.''
Muqatil bin Hayyan said: (and do not Tabarruj yourselves like the Tabarruj of
the times of ignorance,) "Tabarruj is when a woman puts a Khimar on her head but
does not tie it properly.'' So her necklaces, earrings and neck, and all of that
can be seen. This is Tabarruj, and Allah addresses all the women of the
believers with regard to Tabarruj.
Tafsir Ibne Kathir, Tafseer of Surah 33, Verse 33
The word qarna in the original is derived from qarar according
to some lexicographers and from waqar according to others. In the first sense,
it will mean: `Settle down, stick firmly;" and in the second sense: "Live
peacefully, sit with dignity." In both the cases the verse means to impress
that the woman's real sphere of activity is her home; she should carry out her
functions within that sphere peacefully, and she should come out of the house
only in case of a genuine need. This meaning is clear from the words of the
verse itself and the Holy Prophet's Ahadith also impress it even more
forcefully.....
According to another tradition that Bazzar and Tirmidhi have related on the
authority of Hadrat 'Abdullah bin Mas`ud, the Holy Prophet said: `The woman must
remain veiled and concealed. When she comes out of her house, Satan stares at
her. And she is closer to Allah's mercy when she is inside her house." In the
presence of such a clear and express command of the Qur'an, it is not at all
permissible that the Muslim women should seek membership of the councils and
parliaments; that they should run after social activities outside the house;
that they should work side by side with men in the government offices, should
get education along with boys in the colleges, serve as nurses in the male wards
of hospitals, should be employed as hostesses in the aeroplanes and rail cars,
and should be sent abroad for education and training. The greatest argument
that is given in support of the permissibility of the women's outdoor activities
is that Hadrat 'A'ishah had taken part in the Battle of the Camel. But the
people who present this argument perhaps do not know what was Hadrat `A'ishah's
own opinion in this regard. `Abdullah bin Ahmad bin Hanbal has related in his
Zawa id az-Zuhd and Ibn Mundhir, Ibn Abi Shaibah and Ibn Sa'd in their own books
the tradition from Masruq, saying that when Hadrat `A'ishah during her
recitation of the Qur'an would reach this verse (wa qarna fi buyut-i kunna), she
would start crying involuntarily; so much so that her head-wrapper would become
wet, for this reminded her of the error that she had committed in the Battle of
the Camel. In this verse two important words have been used, which must be
understood for the proper understanding of its intention. They are tabarruj and
jahiliyyat al-ula. The word tabarruj in Arabic means to become manifest and
appear openly before others. The Arabs use the word baraj for every conspicuous
and elevated object.....
Tafheem al Quran, By Abul Ala Maududi, Tafseer of Surah 33
Verse 33
According to the Ayah of the Quran, it addresses the wives of the Prophet (SAW) and tells them to
- Not to leave their houses
- Not to display their bodies like the women from the period of ignorance did
- Obey Allah, his Prophet (SAW) and perform their religous obligations
O wives of the Prophet! You are not like any other women.
If you keep you have Taqwa, then be not soft in speech, lest he in whose heart
is a disease should be moved with desire, but speak in an honorable manner
Quran [33:33]
Quran has made it clear that the wives of Prophet (SAW) are not like ordinary women and thus they are liable to certain specific and special merits as well as commandments which might not be applicable to other women. One of the example is to remarry after their husband dies. The wives of Prophet (SAW) cannot marry after the his demise but Muslim women are free to marry after the death of their husbands.
Thus the wives of the Prophet are ordered to stay inside their homes unconditionally and not to display their fineries like the women of period of ignorance would. However, both the commentators, Ibn Kathir and Maududi attribute the order of staying inside their homes to all women, which does not make sense.
Maududi goes on to declare that all Muslim women cannot perform any outdoor duty. He then counters his own declaration by the fact that Ayesha went out of her house in the battle of Jamal. He again counters this argument by claiming that Ayesha realized her mistake/sin/error of disobedience to this Quranic order which caused her to shed tears every time she read the verses.
Both Ibn Kathir and Maududi say that although a muslim women is not allowed to leave her house, she is permissible to do so if the task she is performing is important and special.
When Hadhrath Saudah (RA), wife of the Prophet (s), was asked why she did not perform
Hajj and Umrah (regularly) like other wives of the Prophet (s)? Saudha (RA)
said, "I have performed Hajj and Umrah (before) and Allah has given me the order
to stay at home. By God I will not leave home until my death." The narrator
added "by God, Saudah (RA) did not leave her home after the Prophet (s) until
her death, when her funeral was taken out".
Tafsir Durre Manthur Volume 5 page 196, Tafseer of Surah
33 Verse 33
This verse came down exclusively for the wives of Rasulullah (s) and in the commentary of this verse we can see that Hadhrath Sauda deemed it as a clear injunction for her to remain at home.
Rasulullah (s) had told his wives during Hajjatul Wida (final pilgrimage) that this WAS their first and last Hajj and that in future they were to remain within their homes. Ibne Kathir states that;
"During
the Farewell Hajj, Prophet (s) had told his wives that "This is your last Hajj,
after that you have to pray on floor mats". The narrator then added that except
for Zainab bint e Jahsh (RA) and Saudah(RA) all other wives used to go for Hajj
but these two used to say that "nothing shall move us".
Bidaya wa al Nihaya Volume 7 page 104, under the Chapter "Zainab binte Jahsh"
Why did Ayesha leave her house? She wanted Mawla Ali to punish the killers of Uthman and claimed Ali was protecting them. Thus Jamal was a cry for social justice for some people.
For me, i consider Ali to be nafs-ur-Rasool (Mubahila). For me, fighting Ali is sufficient for me to dissociate myself from them irrespective of the circumstances and intentions. For the sake of argument, i will provide with a Unanimous view of what happened.
Imam Ali (as)'s letter to Hadhrath Ayesha testifies to her being on the wrong path.
Prior to the Battle of Jamal
he [Imam Ali] wrote a letter to Ayesha in which he said 'by leaving your home
you have opposed the order of Allah (swt) and his Rasul (s)"
al Tadkhirath al Khawwas page 38
Matalib al Sa'ul page
112
Ayesha had demonstrated open opposition to Imam 'Ali (as), a refusal to accept his authority and a challenge to him to stop her opposition party. Ayesha's defiant reply to Imam Ali letter proves it;
Son of 'Abu
Talib, the difference between us is irreconcilable, time is running out, and we
shall not submit to your authority, whatever you wish to do, do it.
Matalib al Sa'ul page 116
Fusul ul Muhimma page 72
Imam 'Ali (as) hence was left with no other choice but to quash the opposition. Ayesha had made clear that her intention was that of open defiance and disobedience to the Imam of the time. Letter of Ummul Momineen Hadhrath Umme Salmah to stop Hadhrath Ayesha from participating in the Battle of Jamal is concrete evidence that Hazrat Ayesha was in error.
However Ayesha's intentions were not to avenge Uthman's murder, for she herself was one of his biggest critics. This will be discussed later on. Ayesha wanted to install herself as the Imam over the nation.
The narrator states: I was walking through
Jamal and witnessed a man on the ground rubbing his heels and reciting poetry,
another narrators states that someone asked (the same man) 'Who are you?' to
which he replied 'I am in that woman's army who intends to become Ameerul
Momineen".
Tadkhirath al Khawwas page
43 Chapter "Dhikr Jamal"
Rasulullah (s) condemned women at the helm of a people.
Narrated Abu Bakra: During the battle of Al-Jamal, Allah benefited me with a
Word (I heard from the Prophet). When the Prophet heard the news that the people
of the Persia had made the daughter of Khosrau their Queen (ruler), he said,
"Never will succeed such a nation as makes a woman their ruler."
Sahih al Bukhari Volume 9, Book 88, Number 219
Furthermore, the barking of the dogs of Al-Hawab at Ayesha is proof enough that she was the wife, the Prophet (SAW) had warned about before his demise. The story goes as;
“Isma’eel narrated from Qays who said,
‘When Aysha approached the waters of Bani A’amir, she heard some dogs barking.
Aysha asked, ‘What is the location of these waters?’ She was answered, ‘This is
the waters of the Howab.’ Then she said, ‘I am going back!’ Some of the people
with her said, ‘No, you should go on. Then the Muslims would see you and Allah
would make peace between them.’ Then she said again, ‘I heard that the prophet
peace be upon him said, ‘Then what would you (the wives of the prophet) do when
you hear the barking of Al-Howab dogs?’’ "
http://ansar.org/english/faq18.htm
The authenticity of the narration is is not doubted by the Sunnis.
The story of the dogs of Howab is not
narrated in the nine Sunni books (Saheeh Al-Bukhari, Muslim, Al-Nisa’ei, Ibn
Majah, Al-Turmithi, Abu Dawood, Mowati’a Imam Malik, Musnad Ahmed and Al-Darumi)
except in Musnad Ahmed. Ahmed narrated two versions of the story. Also, the
story is found in Saheeh Ibn Habban, Al-Mustadrik by Al-Hakim, and in history
books. This hadeeth is authentic and true.
http://ansar.org/english/faq18.htm
Thus we know that before the demise of Prophet (SAW), he prophesized about the dogs of Al-Hawab barking at one of his wives, a wife who would be on the wrong and a wife who would earn the displeasure of Prophet (SAW). This explains Ayesha's reactions when she wanted to return but later on continued with the march against Ali (AS).
Sunnis try to defend this event by claiming that her intentions were clean. What her real intentions were will be uncovered by Imam Ali (AS) later on. Anyone who opposes Imam Ali is like opposing the Prophet (SAW) himself.
Ali was
- Mawla of everyone who believed Muhammad (SAW) to be their Mawla. [Read Ali Mawla]
- Ali was Nafs ur-Rasool [Read Mubahila]
- Ali was the part of Ahlulbayt who were purified from all Rijs, who were gathered for Mubahila, while Ayesha is not a part of this Ahlulbayt [Read Who are The Ahlulbayt]
And we do not see intentions when opposition to Allah, his Prophet (SAW) or his Ahlulbayt is concerned.
It is important to know from Imam Ali's own words what he thought about the battle of Jamal, the murder of Uthman and Ayesha's false claim to avenge the murder of Uthman.
Beware! Satan has certainly started instigating his forces
and has collected his army in order that oppression may reach its extreme ends
and wrong may come back to its position. By Allah they have not put a correct
blame on me, nor have they done justice between me and themselves. They are
demanding of me a right which they have abandoned, and a blood that they have
themselves shed. If I were a partner with them in it then they too have
their share of it. But if they did it without me they alone have to face the
consequences. Their biggest argument (against me) is (really) against themselves. They
are suckling from a mother who is already dry, and bringing into life innovation
that is already dead. How disappointing is this challenger (to battle)? Who is
this challenger and for what is he being responded to? I am happy that the
reasoning of Allah has been exhausted before them and He knows (all) about them. The threat to Wage War against them, If they refuse (to obey) I will offer
them the edge of the sword which is enough a curer of wrong and supporter of
Right. It is strange they send me word to proceed to them for
spear-fighting and to keep ready for fighting with swords. May the mourning
women mourn over them. I have ever been so that I was never frightened by
fighting nor threatened by clashing. I enjoy full certainty of belief from my
Allah and have no doubt in my faith.
Peak Of Eloquence (Sermon 22):
Regarding Those Who Blamed Ali for Uthman’s Murder
Both of these two (Talhah and az-Zubayr) wishes the
Caliphate for himself, and is drawing towards himself as against the other
fellow. They do not employ any connection for getting access to Allah nor
proceed towards Him through any means. Both of them bear malice against the
other. Shortly his veil over it will be uncovered. By Allah, if they achieve
what they aim at, one of them will kill the other, and one will finish the
other. The rebellious party has stood up. Where are the seekers of virtue; for
the paths have already been determined and they have been given the news. For
every misguidance there is a cause and for every break of pledge there is a
misrepresentation. By Allah, I shall not be like him who listens to the voice of
mourning, hears the man who brings news of death and also visits the mourner yet
does not take lesson.
Peak Of Eloquence (Sermon 148):
About Talha, Zubair And Jamal
Whoever can at this time keep himself clinging to Allah
should do so. If you follow me I shall certainly carry you, if Allah so wills,
on the path of Paradise, even though it may be full of severe hardship and of
bitter taste. As regards a certain woman, she is in the grip of womanly
views, and malice is boiling in her bosom like the furnace of the blacksmith. If
she were called upon to deal with others as she is dealing with me she would not
have done it. (As for me), even hereafter she will be allowed her original
respect, while the reckoning (of her misdeeds) is an obligation on Allah.
Peak Of Eloquence (Sermon 156): Regarding Malice Of Ayesha
Praise be to Allah from whose view one sky does not conceal
another sky nor one earth another earth. .... O' my Allah! I seek Thy succour against the Quraysh and
those who are assisting them, because they are denying me (the rights of)
kinship, have lowered my high position, and are united in opposing me in the
matter (of the caliphate) which is my right, and then they said, "Know that the
rightful thing is that you have it and also that you may leave it." They (Talhah, az-Zubayr and their supporters) came out
dragging the wife of the Messenger of Allah (the peace and blessing of Allah be
upon him and his descendants) just as a maidslave is dragged for sale. They took
her to Basrah where those two (Talhah and az-Zubayr) put their own women in
their houses but exposed the wife of the Messenger of Allah to themselves and to
others in the army in which there was not a single individual who had not
offered me his obedience and sworn to me allegiance quite obediently, without
any compulsion. Here in Basrah they approached my governor and treasurers of the
public treasury and its other inhabitants. They killed some of them in captivity
and others by treachery. By Allah, even if they had willfully killed only one
individual from among the Muslims without any fault, it would have been lawful
for me to kill the whole of this army because they were present in it but did
not disagree with it nor prevented it by tongue or hand, not to say that they
killed from among the Muslims a number equal to that with which they had marched
on them.
Peak Of Eloquence (Sermon 172):
About Caliphate, Umer and Jamal
As for me, I would never be frightened of fighting or be
made to fear striking because I am satisfied with Allah's promise of support
to me. By Allah, Talhah has hastened with drawn sword to avenge `Uthman's
blood for fear lest the demand for `Uthman's blood be made against himself,
because the people's idea in this matter is about him, and, in fact, he was
the most anxious among them for his killing. Therefore, he has tried to create
misunderstanding by collecting forces in order to confuse the matter and to
create doubt. By Allah. he did not act in either of three ways about `Uthman.
If the son of `Affan (`Uthman) was in the wrong, as Talhah believed, it is
necessary for him to support those who killed him or to keep away from his
supporters. If `Uthman was the victim of oppression. then Talhah should have
been among those who were keeping (the assaulters) away from him or were
advancing pleas on his behalf. If he was in doubt about these two alternatives,
then it was incumbent upon him to leave him (`Uthman) and retire aside and leave
the men with him (to deal with him as they wished). But he adopted none of these
three ways, and came out with a thing in which there is no good, and his excuses
are not acceptable.
Peak Of Eloquence (Sermon 174):
Regarding Talha And Zubair Before Jamal
The following is the letter sent by Imam Ali (AS) through Imam Husayn (AS) and Ammar Yasir to the people of Kufa before he proceeded to Basra for the Battle of Jamal.
This letter is from the servant and creature of Allah,
Ali (a), Amir al-Mu'minin, to Kufiyites who are the leaders of Ansar and
respectable persons. After praising Allah and invoking His Blessings on the
Holy Prophet (s) I want to throw light on the event of the assassination of
Uthman and to make the whole affair as clear as if you were present on the occasion and were witnessing the
event yourself. People were dissatisfied with him (Usman) and were accusing and
blaming him. Out of the Muhajirs I was the only man who wanted to appease and
pacify the people and who did not want to indulge in the activities of those
dissatisfied persons, while Talha and Zubayr were instigating the populace in
such a way that the least they said was worse than the worst that could be
asserted or alleged against Uthman. Their whispering campaign was deadlier than
the loudest propaganda which could be carried on; Aisha also exhibited extreme
annoyance and anger against him. Under such conditions some persons resolved to
kill him and they murdered him. Then everybody (friends and foes alike) came to
me and took the oath of allegiance to me. This was done without any desire, instigation, inducement,
persuasion or compulsion and force on my part. They came to me of their own
free-will, without hesitation, and with pleasure, ecstasy and joy. Let it be known to you that the people of the city towards
which the Holy Prophet (s) had migrated (Madina), is being deserted by its
inhabitants, they are leaving it, it is seething with discontentment and
rebellion. A seditious campaign has started against the Amir. I want you to come
to the help of your Amir to fight against his enemies.
Peak Of Eloquence (Letter 1): To Kufa
Before Jamal
It should be very clear now that Ayesha's stand against Imam Ali was due to her hatred and jealousy for him rather than her sincerity for Uthman, for she was one of the lead critics of Uthman when he was alive.
To conclude a controversial topic, Ayesha was the wife of Prophet (SAW) but had acted treacherously against the AhlulBayt in many places. Our love and loyalty towards the Ahlulbayt lead us to criticize and dislike certain actions of her.
If Ayesha did repent for her sin in Jamal and will be forgiven by Allah Almighty, then people who criticize her for this action will also be forgiven because it was her actions which lead us to dislike her.
But if Ayesha's actions against Imam Ali were infact disobedience to Allah and Prophet (SAW) and even after knowing the facts, people respect Ayesha for her being the wife of Prophet (SAW) and thus they render respect and neutrality towards her unjust actions against Imam Ali, then remember, that Truth is with Ali. Pick your choice. Given the opportunity, will you fight in the army of Imam Ali (AS) against Ayesha, or will you fight in the army of Ayesha against Imam Ali (AS). Our criticism and dislike for Ayesha is a proof that we have picked our side, our place lies in the army of Mawla Ali (AS).
However, unnecessary abuse, specially infront of people who respect Ayesha, is also damaging to Islam and is not the way of the Shia. Every one has a right to choose, to make his pick. Those who love Ayesha are free to do so and we respect that. Those who do not, should start respecting that. Abusing/Cursing Ayesha will not take you to heaven. Loving Ali will. And if our disliking Ayesha is a part of this love, then verily, following the path of Ali (AS) and his teachings is a bigger part of this love.
I heard sunnis believe that following any of the Sahaba ensures guidance because all are like stars at night?
Narrated Abu Maryam Abdullah bin Ziyad Al-Aasadi: When Talha,
AzZubair and 'Aisha moved to Basra, 'Ali sent 'Ammar bin Yasir and Hasan bin
'Ali who came to us at Kufa and ascended the pulpit. Al-Hasan bin 'Ali was at
the top of the pulpit and 'Ammar was below Al-Hasan. We all gathered before him.
I heard 'Ammar saying, "'Aisha has moved to Al-Busra. By Allah! She is the
wife of your Prophet in this world and in the Hereafter. But Allah has put you
to test whether you obey Him (Allah) or her ('Aisha)."
Sahih Bukhari Volume 9, Book 88, Number 220
So according to Ammar, obeying Allah and obeying Aisha were two different things!? And according to him, the choice of Ali over Aisha was a test for all the companions who were present at that time. When we follow the way of a Sahabi, Ammar (R), you criticize us, when we do not follow the Sahabi, you criticize us. Make up your mind.
And i believe that after reading the Role of Tawalla in Islam, my Sunni brothers will agree to the slogan, May Allah have mercy on those who love Ali and May Allah curse those who hate Ali or bore malice against him.
[ Back to top ]
Feel free to
email your comments/replies to this article at
es_ammar@hotmail.com or post a message
at
our Forum, no registration Required.
To view comments/suggestions for this article,
visit Here.