We believe that a true and comprehensive
understanding of Islam would not be possible without careful recognition of the
Prophetic Tradition and the Prophet's Household. And Allah is the Source of Strength.
Event Of Gadeer
Mail
Box Letter Relevant to
this Topic
Letter
01:
Caliphate, Imamat
and Ali's loyalty to Caliphs
Letter
07:
Nomination of Ali
and Refusal of Majority equals Failure of Prophet
Letter
03:
Mawlayiat of Ali (AS), Zaid and the Ahadith
I hope you have read articles related to Imamat and Mawlayiat of Ali Ibne Abu Talib. Coming straight to the point;
O Messenger! deliver what bas been
revealed to you from your Lord; and if you do it not, then you have not
delivered His message, and Allah will protect you from the people; surely
Allah will not guide the unbelieving people.
Quran [5:67]
This verse was revealed at Gadeer. What was the message the prophet was told to deliver, and if was being delivered to Muslims only, then why was Allah's protection required.
The Ummah of Muhammad has testified that
he has delivered the Message and fulfilled the trust, when he asked them during
the biggest gathering in his speech during the Farewell Hajj. At that time,
there were over forty thousand of his Companions. ......... (And if you do not,
then you have not conveyed His Message.) "It means, if you hide only one Ayah
that was revealed to you from your Lord, then you have not conveyed His
Message.'' Allah's statement, (Allah will protect you from mankind.) means, you
convey My Message and I will protect, aid and support you over your enemies and
will grant you victory over them. Therefore, do not have any fear or sadness,
for none of them will be able to touch you with harm. Before this Ayah was
revealed, the Prophet was being guarded........
Tasir Ibne Kathir, Tafsir of Verse 67 Surah 5
We agree that the verse was revealed at the moment of the farewell pilgrimage. Ibne Kathir however then takes the interpretation of this verse to link it with events of the past. Analyzing the fact that at the Hajj, there were more than 40,000 Muslims/Sahabas with Prophet Muhammad (SAW) who had hopefully believed in everything the prophet (SAW) had said so far. They believed Muhammad to be a Prophet of Allah and they were prepared to follow/believe everything Muhammad (SAW) would say.
According to the verse, Prophet (SAW) was told to deliver a message,
- Which if not delivered would nullify the efforts of Prophet (SAW)
- Which would be the completion of religion
- which would trigger offensive response from the muslims/companions gathered, thus protection from Allah was granted
According to Ibn Kathir, the final message which Allah asked the Prophet (SAW) to deliver was to summarize the whole basics/concepts/teachings of Islam which the Prophet (SAW) did in the final sermon. Without any doubt, the prophet did deliver that sermon but that sermon was not what this verse had ordered, for simple reasons;
- If the message this verse speaks about is really a summary of Islam, then what is the reason for protecting the Prophet (SAW) at such a late stage of his mission? I believe if you being a muslim tell a fellow muslim about keeping up prayers and fasting in Ramadan etc, he will happily agree to you rather than being offensive. You will be least scared when telling a fellow Muslim about Islam. Infact if you start criticizing someone else's belief, that is the time when you are most prone to an offensive attack. You must note that this verse tells the Prophet to tell an Islamic message to Muslims and is not revealed at the initial stages of Islam. Why would the Prophet expect an offensive response from Companions if he is only reminding them of what they already believe in?
- The deliverance in this verse speaks about a new message. For failing to repeat the same message already delivered (summarizing) is not like failing to deliver at all.
What is this message then? Definitely it was something which would arouse an unexpected and unfavorable response from the people. What could be more worse than to know that your teacher grades a student with bias because the student is related to the teacher? Read Why Ali to know what i am talking about.
As the Prophet pulled up his reins, the
whole entourage came to a halt. Those who had gone ahead were summoned back. The
pebbles and thorns were brushed aside and a makeshift pulpit of saddles was set
up. People clustered round, the Prophet bent down and lifted Ali in his hands,
and showing him to the crowds on all sides of the pulpit and proclaimed,
"Allah is my Mawla, Of whomsoever I am the Mawla, This Ali is his Mawla.
Whoever obeys 'Ali, obeys me, whoever obeys me, obeys Allah, whoever disobeys
'Ali disobeys me, whoever disobeys me, disobeys Allah"
Kanz ul Ummal, hadith numbers 32973-32976
Mustadrak al Hakim Volume 3 page 123
Riyadh ul Nadira Volume 3 page 110
Click below for
scanned page:
The Ghadir Declaration, by Dr Muhammad Tahir ul Qadri, page 49
It was on this occasion that the Holy Prophet made the choice final, leaving no doubt or uncertainty in the selection of his Successor. It was a matter of prime importance that the Divine Guidance should continue after him and that the Divine Sovereignty should be exercised by the chosen ones of God, to be appointed by the Prophet.
The declaration of Ali’s wilayath was to quell the scheming / nefarious planning of the hypocrites. Why was Imam Ali's nomination important is discussed in other articles such as Why Ali. This one only deals with the authenticity of the reports.
The question now arises that people oppsed La Illaha
Illallah, as well as Muhammad Ur Rasool Allah but the quran never said that
allah will protect the prophet from the people who oppose this message but Allah
will protect the prophet from the people who oppose the message of Gadeer, Ali
Yun Wali Allah. It was beautifully explained by Talib Johri that
when La Illaha Illallah was under
threat, Ali protected the prophet, when Muhammad Ur Rasool Allah was under
threat, Ali protected the prophet, and when Ali Yun Walli Allah is under threat,
Allah will protect. Such a bond existed between Ali and Allah. Allah
knew the reactions of ummah.
This was clearly that matter that Rasulullah (s) feared that the people would
oppose. With the open declaration of
Ali’s Wilayath all rules / regulations were completed. Deen was completed with
the appointment of a successor / a Guide to ensure that the people followed the
right path. We believe that the evidence is so clear that any
rational mind will conclude that this was a declaration of Imamate.
The birth, the alliance, the character of
Ali, which exalted him above the rest of his countrymen, might justify his
claim to the vacant throne of Arabia. The son of Abu Talib was, in his own
right, the chief of the family of Hashim, and the hereditary prince or guardian
of the city and temple of Mecca. The light of prophecy was extinct, but the
husband of Fatima might expect the inheritance and blessing of her father: the
Arabs had sometimes been patient of a female reign: and the two grandsons of
the Prophet had often been fondled in his lap and shown in his pulpit, as the
hope of his age, and the chief of the youth of paradise. From the first hour
of his mission to the last rites of his funeral, the apostle was never forsaken
by a generous friend, whom he delighted to name his brother, his vicegerent, and
the faithful Aaron of a second Moses’.
Gibbon abridged by W. Smith, p. 466.
“Ali was cousin-germane of Muhammad and
husband of Fatima, his beloved daughter. The right of succession, in order of
consanguinity, lay with Ali; and his virtues and services eminently entitled him
to it. On the first burst of his generous zeal, when Islamism was a derided and
persecuted faith, he had been pronounced by Muhammad his brother, his
vicegerent; he had ever since been devoted to him in word and deed, and had
honored the cause by his magnanimity as signally as he had vindicated it by his
valor.”
W. Irving
Sunnis however do agree that the event of Gadeer is true. References will be presented later. But most of them interpret the verse Mawla as friend and perhaps not a master/Imam/Caliph. Even if we take the word Mawla to be a friend, then those who fought Mawla Ali (AS) did not obviously consider him to be their friend, and similarly they rejected their loyalty to Prophet Muhammad (SAW) as well. I will not name who did what in this article.
Following are the reports of the event of Gadeer as reported above in sunni narrations:
Prophet said: "O Allah! You also may witness." Then he said: 'O my people! Allah is my Mawla and I am mawla of the faithful and I have superior right on and control over their lives. And this Ali is the mawla of all those of whom I am mawla. O Allah! Love him who loves him and hate him who hates him."
Sunni Traditionists who mentioned
the Tradition of Ghadir Khum above
Mohammed Ibn Idris al-Shafi'i (Imam al-Shafi'i, d.
204) per "al-Nihayah" by Ibn al-Athir
Ahmad Ibn Hanbal (Imam al-Hanbali, d. 241), in "Masnad" and "al-Manaqib"
Ibn Majah (d. 273), in "Sunan Ibn Majah"
al-Tirmidhi (d. 279), in "Sahih al-Tirmidhi"
al-Nisa'i (d. 303), in "al-Khasa'is"
Abu-Ya'la al-Mousilli (d. 307), in "al-Masnad"
al-Baghawi (d. 317), in "al-Sunan"
al-Doolabi (d. 320), in "al-Kuna wal Asmaa"
al-Tahawi (d. 321), in "Mushkil al-Athar"
al-Hakim (d. 405), in "al-Mustadrak"
Ibn al-Maghazili al-Shafi'i (d. 483), in "al-Manaqib"
Muhammad al-Ghazzali (d. 505), in "Sirrul `Alamayn"
Ibn Mindah al-Asbahani (d. 512), in his book
al-Khatib al-Khawarizmi (d. 568), in "al-Manaqib" and "Maqtal al-Imam al-Sibt"
Abul Faraj Ibn al-Jawzi (d. 597), in "Manaqib"
al-Ganji al-Shafi'i (d. 658), in "Kifayat al-Talib"
Muhib al-Din al-Tabari (d. 694), in "al-Riyadh al-Nadhirah" and "Dhakha'ir al-'Aqabi"
al-Hamawainy (d. 722), in "Fara'id al-Samdtin"
al-Dhahabi (d. 748), in "al-Talkhis"
al-Khatib al-Tabrizi (d. 8th century), in "Mishkat al-Masabih"
al-Haythami (d. 807), in "Majma' al-Zawa'id"
al-Jazri (d. 830), in "Asna al-Matalib"
Abul Abbas al-Qastalani (d. 923), in "al-Mawahib al-Ladaniya"
al-Muttaqi al-Hindi (d. 975), in "Kanz al-Ummal"
Abdul Haqq al-Dihlawi, in "Sharh al-Mishkat"
al-Hurawi al-Qari (d. 1014), in "al-Muraqat fi Sharh al-Mishkat"
al-Shaikhani al-Qadiri, in "al-Siratul Sawi fi Manaqib Aal al-Nabi"
Ba Kathir al-Makki (d. 1047), in "Wasilatul Amal fi Manaqib al-Aal"
Abu-Abdullah al-Zarqani al-Maliki (d. 1122), in "Sharh al-Mawahib"
Ibn Hamzah al-Dimashqi al-Hanafi, in "al-Bayan wal Taarif"
Sunni Commentators of Quran who
mentioned Ghadir Khum
Ibn Jarir al-Tabari (d. 310), in "Tafsir al-Bayan"
al-Jassas (d. 370), in "Ahkam al-Quran"
al-Hafiz Abu Nu'aym (d. 430), in "Asbab al-Nuzool"
al-Tha'labi (d. 427 or 437), in "Tafsir al-Tha'labi"
al-Wahidi (d. 468), in "Asbab al-Nuzool"
al-Qurtubi (d. 568), in "Tafsir Jamiul Hukam al-Quran"
al-Fakhr al-Razi (d. 606), in "al-Tafsir al-Kabir"
al-Khazin Baghdadi (d. 741), in "Tafsir al-Khazin"
al-Nisaboori (8th century), in "Tafsir al-Nisaboori"
al-Hafiz Jalaluddin al-Suyuti (d. 910), in his "Tafsir"
al-Khatib al-Sharbini, in his "Tafsir"
Abu al-Saud al-Hanafi (d. 972), in his "Tafsir"
al-Aloosi al-Baghdadi (d. 1270), in his "Tafsir"
Sunni Historians who mentioned the
Tradition of Ghadir Khum
Ibn Qutaybah (d. 276), in "Ma'arif" and "Imamah wal
Siyasah"
al-Baladhuri (d. 279), in "Ansab al-ashraf"
Ibn Zawlaq al-Laithi al-Misri (d. 287), in his book
Ibn Jarir al-Tabari (d. 310), in an exclussive book "Kitabul Wilayah"
al-Khatib al-Baghdadi (d. 463), in "Tarikh Baghdad"
Ibn Abd al-Bar (d. 463), in "al-Isti'ab"
al-Shahristani (d. 548), in "al-Milal wal Nihal"
Ibn 'Asakir (d. 571), in "Tarikh Ibn 'Asakir" and "Yaqoot al-Hamawi"
Ibn al-Athir (d. 630), in "Usd al-Ghabah"
Sibt Ibn al-Jawzi (d. 654), in "Tadhkirat Khawas al-Ummah"
Ibn Abi al-Hadid (d. 656), in "Sharh Nahjul Balagha"
Ibn Khalkan (d. 681), in "Tarikh Ibn Khalkan"
Abul Fida (d. 732), in his "Tarikh"
al-Dhahabi (d. 748) , in "Tadhkirat al-Huffadh"
al-Yafi'i (d. 768), in "Miraat al-Jinan"
Ibn al-Shaikh al-Balawi, in "Alef Baa"
Ibn Kathir (d. 774), in "al-Bidayah wal Nihayah"
Ibn Khaldoon (d. 808), in "al-Muqaddimah"
al-Nuwairi (d. ~833), in "Nihayat al-Irab fi Finoon al-Adab"
al-Maqrizi (d. 845), in "al-Khitat"
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani (d. 852), in "al-Isabah" and "Tahdhib al-Tahdhib"
Ibn al-Sabbagh al-Maliki (d. 855), in "al-Fusool al-Muhimmah"
Mir Khand (d. 903), in "Habib al-Siyar"
Jalalulddin al-Suyuti (d. 910), in "Tarikh al-Khulafa"
Ibn Hajar al-Haythami, (d. 974), in "al-Sawa'iq al-Muhriqah"
al-Hafiz Ahmad Ibn Muhammad al-'Asimi, in "Zain al-Fata"
al-Qirmani al-Dimashqi (d. 1019), in "Akhbar al-Duwal"
Noor al-Din al-Halabi (d. 1044), in "al-Sirah al-Halabiyah"
The Tradition of Ghadir Khum in parallel
(mutawatir)
Ahmad Ibn Hanbal narrated it from 40 chains;
Ibn Jarir al-Tabari in more than 70 chains;
Abu Sa'id al-Sijistani from 120 chains;
Abu Bakir al-Jaabi from 125 chains;
al-Amir Muhammad al-Yamani (2nd century) had 150 chains;
al-Dhahabi has written a complete book on its chains and passed a verdict that
it is Mutawatir;
Abul Abbas Ibn `Uqdah has narrated it through 150 chains.
Anyhow there were several reasons why there was a general hate towards Imam Ali from the people contrary to the Quranic and Prophetic orders.
- Imam Ali was the undisputed Muslim hero, the war champion, Haider e Qarar (who doesn’t run away from battles), Shah e Mardan (king of men), Sher e Yazdaan (Lion of yazdan), Kuwat e parvardigaar (strength of Almighty himself), la fata (unconquerable). He killed many pagans and infidels during various gazwas. Before conquest of Mecca, there were only 10,000 Muslims, but after the fall of Mecca, the number rose to 124,000. People who rejected Islam for 23 years converted overnight. Most of their pagan brothers, fathers, husbands, sons were killed by Imam Ali during anti-Islamic wars. They didn’t forget their loved ones and naturally hated their killer, Imam Ali.
- Imam Ali’s excellence exceeded everyone else’s, his qualities remained unshared. Jealousy amongst the Arabs was common. Most of the sahabis of Prophet were jealous of him.
- Imam Ali was Prophet Muhammad’s ultimate first choice in all fields. The flag carrier, cousin, son in law, war heroe, even a successor. Muslims didn’t wanted prophethood and imamat to remain in one family. They started to oppose imam Ali. It is natural too that if a student in a university is a close relative of the chancellor, and this student is preferred by all teachers, made the head of council and gains the highest marks and excels in sports (deservably), people will still doubt the ability of the student and the honesty of the chancellor considering their relationship. Same was the issue with Prophet Muhammad and Imam Ali.
[ Back to top ]
Feel free to
email your comments/replies to this article at
es_ammar@hotmail.com or post a message
at
our Forum, no registration Required.
To view comments/suggestions for this article,
visit Here.